Planned Portal Maintenance: May 20, 2025

TACC will be performing maintenance on the DesignSafe portal on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. The portal will be unavailable from 8:30AM-9:00AM CST.

Unsupported Browser

Your browser is not supported by DesignSafe. Please switch to Chrome or Firefox if you experience issues.

PRJ-3514 | U.S. National Vs30 Maps Informed by Remote Sensing and Machine Learning
Cite This Data:
Geyin, M., B. Maurer (2022). U.S. National Vs30 Maps Informed by Remote Sensing and Machine Learning. DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-80d8-9m83

Authors;
Data Type(s)Model
Natural Hazard Type(s)Earthquake
Date of Publication2022-06-02
KeywordsVS30, Seismic-wave velocity, site response, ground motions
DOI10.17603/ds2-80d8-9m83
License
 Open Data Commons Attribution
Description:

The shear-wave velocity time-averaged over the upper 30 m (VS30) is widely used as a proxy for site effects, forms the basis of seismic site class, and underpins site-amplification factors in empirical ground-motion models. Many earthquake simulations therefore require VS30. This presents a challenge at regional scale, given the infeasibility of subsurface testing over vast areas. While various models for predicting VS30 have thus been proposed, the most popular U.S. national, or “background,” model is a regression equation based on just one variable. Given the growth of community datasets, satellite remote sensing, and algorithmic learning, more advanced and accurate solutions may be possible. Towards that end, we develop national VS30 models and maps using field data from over 7,000 sites and machine learning (ML), wherein up to 17 geospatial parameters are used to predict subsurface conditions (i.e., VS30). Of the two models developed, that using geologic data performs marginally better, yet such data is not always available. Both models significantly outperform existing solutions in unbiased testing and are used to create new VS30 maps at ~220 m resolution. These maps are updated in the vicinity of field measurements using regression kriging and cover the 50 U.S. states and Puerto Rico. Ultimately, and like any model, performance cannot be known where data is sparse. In this regard, alternative maps that use other models are proposed for steep slopes. More broadly, this study demonstrates the utility of ML for inferring below-ground conditions from geospatial data, a technique that could be applied to other data and objectives.

File NameSizeLast Modified
 
Data Depot | DesignSafe-CI